https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391198 The court found that the oral agreement between the two companies was not valid under the current legal framework. The plaint did not disclose a cause of action, leading to the rejection of the plaint in O.S.No.21 of 2009. The Civil Revision Petition was allowed, the previous order was set aside, and all pending miscellaneous petitions were closed. en-us Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jan 2020 08:26:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391198 The court found that the oral agreement between the two companies was not valid under the current legal framework. The plaint did not disclose a cause of action, leading to the rejection of the plaint in O.S.No.21 of 2009. The Civil Revision Petition was allowed, the previous order was set aside, and all pending miscellaneous petitions were closed. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391198