<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 809 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391196</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that a retired individual can practice as a &#039;Professional&#039; without prejudice. Notice was to be served to the Respondent via Speed Post, with email notice if provided by the Appellant. The case&#039;s impugned order dated 4th January, 2020 was stayed pending further instructions, with the next hearing set for 3rd February, 2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 08:25:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 809 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391196</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that a retired individual can practice as a &#039;Professional&#039; without prejudice. Notice was to be served to the Respondent via Speed Post, with email notice if provided by the Appellant. The case&#039;s impugned order dated 4th January, 2020 was stayed pending further instructions, with the next hearing set for 3rd February, 2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>