<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty u/s 78 Not Justified: No Evidence of Suppression or Misstatement in Service Tax Short Payment Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51352</link>
    <description>Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - based on the records, maintained by the appellant, the short payment of Service Tax on the GTA service was detected by the department. - the charges of suppression, misstatement etc. cannot be leveled against the appellant, justifying invocation of the provisions of Section 78 of the Act for imposition of penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 08:12:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 08:12:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty u/s 78 Not Justified: No Evidence of Suppression or Misstatement in Service Tax Short Payment Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51352</link>
      <description>Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - based on the records, maintained by the appellant, the short payment of Service Tax on the GTA service was detected by the department. - the charges of suppression, misstatement etc. cannot be leveled against the appellant, justifying invocation of the provisions of Section 78 of the Act for imposition of penalty.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 08:12:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>