https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391184 The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's decision that the plaintiff had lent Rs. 80,000 to the defendant, which was not repaid. The court found the documentary evidence admissible and relevant, rejecting arguments related to the Benami Act. The High Court's judgment overturning the trial court's findings was upheld, and the appellants were directed to pay Rs. 80,000 with interest and costs. en-us Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jan 2020 07:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391184 The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's decision that the plaintiff had lent Rs. 80,000 to the defendant, which was not repaid. The court found the documentary evidence admissible and relevant, rejecting arguments related to the Benami Act. The High Court's judgment overturning the trial court's findings was upheld, and the appellants were directed to pay Rs. 80,000 with interest and costs. Case-Laws Benami Property Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391184