https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285678 The court admitted the case for further consideration to address a substantial question of law concerning the sustainability of an adjudication order issued after the omission of section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court emphasized the significance of the initiation date of the proceedings, which predated the relevant legislative change. This decision indicated the court's intent to evaluate the justifiability of the Tribunal's reliance on previous court decisions in a manner consistent with the timeline of the proceedings, aiming for a fair and legally sound resolution. en-us Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Jan 2020 20:21:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285678 The court admitted the case for further consideration to address a substantial question of law concerning the sustainability of an adjudication order issued after the omission of section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court emphasized the significance of the initiation date of the proceedings, which predated the relevant legislative change. This decision indicated the court's intent to evaluate the justifiability of the Tribunal's reliance on previous court decisions in a manner consistent with the timeline of the proceedings, aiming for a fair and legally sound resolution. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285678