https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285673 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to disallow the deduction of operating expenses under section 57 of the IT Act, treating agricultural income as income from other sources, and adding unexplained cash deposits in the appellant's bank account. The appellant's failure to provide sufficient evidence and contest effectively led to the dismissal of the appeal. The Tribunal found no error in the CIT(A)'s order and deemed the stay application infructuous. en-us Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Jan 2020 20:21:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285673 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to disallow the deduction of operating expenses under section 57 of the IT Act, treating agricultural income as income from other sources, and adding unexplained cash deposits in the appellant's bank account. The appellant's failure to provide sufficient evidence and contest effectively led to the dismissal of the appeal. The Tribunal found no error in the CIT(A)'s order and deemed the stay application infructuous. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285673