<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1370 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285684</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed both appeals, sustaining only 50% of the additions made by the AO. The judgment balanced agricultural income and unexplained sources, considering the nature of deposits and explanations provided. The decision highlighted the importance of thorough assessment and clear evidence in determining income sources for tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 20:21:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1370 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285684</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed both appeals, sustaining only 50% of the additions made by the AO. The judgment balanced agricultural income and unexplained sources, considering the nature of deposits and explanations provided. The decision highlighted the importance of thorough assessment and clear evidence in determining income sources for tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>