https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285681 A plaint may be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC when its own averments show that the suit is barred by limitation under Article 59 of the Limitation Act. The Court found that the plaint admitted execution of a registered gift deed in 1981 and disclosed no challenge for about 22 years, so the limitation bar was apparent on a meaningful reading of the pleadings. Such a challenge could not be saved by clever drafting, and the issue did not have to await evidence. The plaint was therefore liable to rejection at the threshold, and the rejection was restored. en-us Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jul 2026 15:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285681 A plaint may be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC when its own averments show that the suit is barred by limitation under Article 59 of the Limitation Act. The Court found that the plaint admitted execution of a registered gift deed in 1981 and disclosed no challenge for about 22 years, so the limitation bar was apparent on a meaningful reading of the pleadings. Such a challenge could not be saved by clever drafting, and the issue did not have to await evidence. The plaint was therefore liable to rejection at the threshold, and the rejection was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285681