https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391153 The Tribunal found that the appellant violated the conditions of the exemption notification by using the imported aircraft for private purposes, contrary to the requirement of non-scheduled air transport services. The Commissioner (Preventive) had the authority to issue the show cause notice, and the appellant was liable to pay customs duty for the violation. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of adhering to exemption conditions and the Customs Department's role in ensuring compliance. en-us Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391153 The Tribunal found that the appellant violated the conditions of the exemption notification by using the imported aircraft for private purposes, contrary to the requirement of non-scheduled air transport services. The Commissioner (Preventive) had the authority to issue the show cause notice, and the appellant was liable to pay customs duty for the violation. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of adhering to exemption conditions and the Customs Department's role in ensuring compliance. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391153