https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391145 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to avail the previously denied Cenvat credit for 'Construction Service' and 'Building Maintenance Service.' The Tribunal held that since the distribution of credit by the head office acting as an ISD was not disputed, the appellant was entitled to the credit under Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Referring to Rule 7, the Tribunal emphasized that the admissibility of credit could not be disputed when not challenged by the head office. Consequently, the appellant was granted relief, and the impugned order was set aside. en-us Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Jan 2020 08:15:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391145 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to avail the previously denied Cenvat credit for 'Construction Service' and 'Building Maintenance Service.' The Tribunal held that since the distribution of credit by the head office acting as an ISD was not disputed, the appellant was entitled to the credit under Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Referring to Rule 7, the Tribunal emphasized that the admissibility of credit could not be disputed when not challenged by the head office. Consequently, the appellant was granted relief, and the impugned order was set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391145