<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 744 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391131</link>
    <description>During the pendency of an ongoing enquiry, the petitioners sought protection from coercive action. As they expressed readiness to join the enquiry and produce the required documents, the Delhi HC directed the respondents not to take coercive steps against them until the next hearing, while also calling for a reply and listing the matter for further consideration. The operative effect was interim protection pending continuation of the enquiry and further judicial review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 744 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391131</link>
      <description>During the pendency of an ongoing enquiry, the petitioners sought protection from coercive action. As they expressed readiness to join the enquiry and produce the required documents, the Delhi HC directed the respondents not to take coercive steps against them until the next hearing, while also calling for a reply and listing the matter for further consideration. The operative effect was interim protection pending continuation of the enquiry and further judicial review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>