https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285658 The expression "undischarged insolvent" in Article 191(1)(c) was held to bear its settled insolvency-law meaning, so the Election Court could not declare a returned candidate disqualified without an adjudication by the competent insolvency court under the insolvency statute. On that ground, the election could not be voided. The allegations of corrupt practice, including bribery, excessive election expenditure and misuse of official position, also failed because the evidence was vague, conjectural and unsupported by direct proof. The election-voiding finding was set aside, while the challenge based on corrupt practice was rejected. en-us Wed, 15 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:23:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285658 The expression "undischarged insolvent" in Article 191(1)(c) was held to bear its settled insolvency-law meaning, so the Election Court could not declare a returned candidate disqualified without an adjudication by the competent insolvency court under the insolvency statute. On that ground, the election could not be voided. The allegations of corrupt practice, including bribery, excessive election expenditure and misuse of official position, also failed because the evidence was vague, conjectural and unsupported by direct proof. The election-voiding finding was set aside, while the challenge based on corrupt practice was rejected. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 15 Sep 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285658