<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1871 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285646</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded two appeals concerning transfer pricing adjustments on Advertising Marketing Promotion expenditure for the Assessment Year 2011-2012. The Court set aside the previous Bright Line Test ruling for determining the arms length price and directed the ITAT to conduct a fresh determination without referencing the prior order. The appeals were partly allowed, instructing the ITAT to reconsider the issues raised by the parties and provide a merit-based finding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 16:36:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1871 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285646</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded two appeals concerning transfer pricing adjustments on Advertising Marketing Promotion expenditure for the Assessment Year 2011-2012. The Court set aside the previous Bright Line Test ruling for determining the arms length price and directed the ITAT to conduct a fresh determination without referencing the prior order. The appeals were partly allowed, instructing the ITAT to reconsider the issues raised by the parties and provide a merit-based finding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>