<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1905 (8) TMI 1 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285631</link>
    <description>Jurisdiction under section 145 of the Criminal Procedure Code depends on the Magistrate&#039;s satisfaction that a dispute is likely to cause breach of peace, while publication of the notice under section 145(3) is a procedural requirement in exercising that jurisdiction. Failure to publish the notice at or near the subject of dispute is therefore an irregularity, not a defect going to jurisdiction, unless material prejudice is shown. As the parties were served, appeared, contested the matter, and no prejudice to any interested person was established, the proceeding was sustained and the supervisory challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 1905 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 14:19:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1905 (8) TMI 1 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285631</link>
      <description>Jurisdiction under section 145 of the Criminal Procedure Code depends on the Magistrate&#039;s satisfaction that a dispute is likely to cause breach of peace, while publication of the notice under section 145(3) is a procedural requirement in exercising that jurisdiction. Failure to publish the notice at or near the subject of dispute is therefore an irregularity, not a defect going to jurisdiction, unless material prejudice is shown. As the parties were served, appeared, contested the matter, and no prejudice to any interested person was established, the proceeding was sustained and the supervisory challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 1905 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>