<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 838 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285623</link>
    <description>Interim relief was granted to preserve the functioning of a public-benefit hospital project while the writ petitions remained pending. The Corporation was directed to issue no objection for creation of a mortgage to facilitate financing, but only without prejudice to its contention that the land itself could not be mortgaged. Pending final adjudication, the petitioners were also directed to continue the specified treatment facilities, keep separate accounts for disputed medicines and allied free treatment expenses, and comply with monitoring by a designated officer. The arrangement was framed to maintain operational continuity and protect both parties&#039; rights until final hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:18:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 838 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285623</link>
      <description>Interim relief was granted to preserve the functioning of a public-benefit hospital project while the writ petitions remained pending. The Corporation was directed to issue no objection for creation of a mortgage to facilitate financing, but only without prejudice to its contention that the land itself could not be mortgaged. Pending final adjudication, the petitioners were also directed to continue the specified treatment facilities, keep separate accounts for disputed medicines and allied free treatment expenses, and comply with monitoring by a designated officer. The arrangement was framed to maintain operational continuity and protect both parties&#039; rights until final hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>