<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 728 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391115</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s reasons for reopening the assessment under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act were vague and lacked specific details linking the alleged income escapement to the assessee. The reliance on survey statements and third-party statements without independent verification was deemed unjustified. Additionally, the reclassification of income from commodity transactions lacked proper basis. As a result, the reassessment order was quashed, and all appeals of the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:27:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 728 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391115</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s reasons for reopening the assessment under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act were vague and lacked specific details linking the alleged income escapement to the assessee. The reliance on survey statements and third-party statements without independent verification was deemed unjustified. Additionally, the reclassification of income from commodity transactions lacked proper basis. As a result, the reassessment order was quashed, and all appeals of the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>