<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 716 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391103</link>
    <description>The appellant was penalized for violating SEBI circulars related to client fund segregation and unauthorized fund transfers between securities and commodities accounts. The penalties imposed were reduced in all three appeals by the Tribunal, citing reasons such as client consent for fund transfers and lack of complaints from clients regarding unauthorized payments. The penalties were reduced from a total of Rs. 24 lacs to Rs. 12 lacs across the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 08:41:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 716 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391103</link>
      <description>The appellant was penalized for violating SEBI circulars related to client fund segregation and unauthorized fund transfers between securities and commodities accounts. The penalties imposed were reduced in all three appeals by the Tribunal, citing reasons such as client consent for fund transfers and lack of complaints from clients regarding unauthorized payments. The penalties were reduced from a total of Rs. 24 lacs to Rs. 12 lacs across the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>