<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (8) TMI 38 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21082</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the Income-tax Officer should have given the petitioner an opportunity to be heard before initiating reassessment proceedings. The court directed that if the Officer, after providing an opportunity, is satisfied that the notice was justified, he may proceed with reassessment. Otherwise, proceedings under section 147(a) should be dropped. The writ petition was allowed, and the petitioner was awarded costs of Rs. 700.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:20:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (8) TMI 38 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21082</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the Income-tax Officer should have given the petitioner an opportunity to be heard before initiating reassessment proceedings. The court directed that if the Officer, after providing an opportunity, is satisfied that the notice was justified, he may proceed with reassessment. Otherwise, proceedings under section 147(a) should be dropped. The writ petition was allowed, and the petitioner was awarded costs of Rs. 700.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>