<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1683 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285616</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta upheld the decisions of the appellate authorities, emphasizing that rectification under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, requires a clear and indisputable error that is obvious and patent from the record. The court dismissed the appeals, affirming that the Assessing Officer&#039;s attempt to rectify the assessment order based on undisclosed capital gains did not meet the criteria for rectification under Section 154.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 07:40:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1683 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285616</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta upheld the decisions of the appellate authorities, emphasizing that rectification under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, requires a clear and indisputable error that is obvious and patent from the record. The court dismissed the appeals, affirming that the Assessing Officer&#039;s attempt to rectify the assessment order based on undisclosed capital gains did not meet the criteria for rectification under Section 154.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>