https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285617 Anticipatory bail was granted because the investigation material did not show direct prima facie involvement in the alleged GST evasion, and custodial interrogation was not demonstrated to be necessary. The Court also found no credible material suggesting that the accused would abscond, tamper with evidence, or influence witnesses. On that basis, the apprehension of arrest for the alleged non-bailable offences was sufficient to justify pre-arrest protection under Section 438 CrPC. en-us Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Mar 2025 16:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285617 Anticipatory bail was granted because the investigation material did not show direct prima facie involvement in the alleged GST evasion, and custodial interrogation was not demonstrated to be necessary. The Court also found no credible material suggesting that the accused would abscond, tamper with evidence, or influence witnesses. On that basis, the apprehension of arrest for the alleged non-bailable offences was sufficient to justify pre-arrest protection under Section 438 CrPC. Case-Laws GST Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285617