<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 829 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285601</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal found that section 50C of the IT Act, 1961 did not apply to the transfer of leasehold rights in the property. The Assessing Officer was directed to use the actual sales consideration in computing capital gains, providing relief to the appellant. The judgment emphasized the distinction between ownership and tenancy rights in property transfers, supporting the appellant&#039;s case and upholding their grievance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2020 16:25:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 829 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285601</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant. The Tribunal found that section 50C of the IT Act, 1961 did not apply to the transfer of leasehold rights in the property. The Assessing Officer was directed to use the actual sales consideration in computing capital gains, providing relief to the appellant. The judgment emphasized the distinction between ownership and tenancy rights in property transfers, supporting the appellant&#039;s case and upholding their grievance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>