https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285598 Sanction for prosecution under the special statute, the Penal Code and the Explosive Substances Act was upheld because the sanctioning authority considered the FIR, recovery material, disclosure statements and draft charge-sheet, and the record supported its competence. Alleged investigation irregularities, including the timing of the special statute and interception measures, did not vitiate the trial absent prejudice. The Court accepted electronic call records as admissible where statutory requirements were met, held that Section 27 discovery is limited to the fact distinctly discovered, and treated confessions before the competent police officer as admissible only against their makers. On the evidence, two accused were convicted for conspiracy and waging war, while the remaining two were acquitted for want of a complete chain. en-us Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Jan 2020 15:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285598 Sanction for prosecution under the special statute, the Penal Code and the Explosive Substances Act was upheld because the sanctioning authority considered the FIR, recovery material, disclosure statements and draft charge-sheet, and the record supported its competence. Alleged investigation irregularities, including the timing of the special statute and interception measures, did not vitiate the trial absent prejudice. The Court accepted electronic call records as admissible where statutory requirements were met, held that Section 27 discovery is limited to the fact distinctly discovered, and treated confessions before the competent police officer as admissible only against their makers. On the evidence, two accused were convicted for conspiracy and waging war, while the remaining two were acquitted for want of a complete chain. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285598