<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 707 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391094</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the classification of &quot;Odomos&quot; as a mosquito repellent under heading 38089191, affirming the order of the Appellate Authority. The petitioner&#039;s argument for classification under heading 3004 as a medicament was rejected. The writ petition was dismissed, and the Appellate Authority&#039;s order was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 707 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391094</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the classification of &quot;Odomos&quot; as a mosquito repellent under heading 38089191, affirming the order of the Appellate Authority. The petitioner&#039;s argument for classification under heading 3004 as a medicament was rejected. The writ petition was dismissed, and the Appellate Authority&#039;s order was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>