<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 692 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391079</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s final order, dismissing the writ petition. It found the petitioner did not make a full and true disclosure of income, rejected coercion and duress claims due to tax payment, and agreed with the lack of corroborative evidence. The court emphasized the Settlement Commission&#039;s thorough examination of facts, supporting its decision without procedural impropriety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2020 13:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 692 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391079</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s final order, dismissing the writ petition. It found the petitioner did not make a full and true disclosure of income, rejected coercion and duress claims due to tax payment, and agreed with the lack of corroborative evidence. The court emphasized the Settlement Commission&#039;s thorough examination of facts, supporting its decision without procedural impropriety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>