<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 689 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391076</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes, directing the AO to re-examine both the primary and alternative claims for exemption under sections 11 and 10(23C) of the Income Tax Act, respectively. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the additional evidences provided by the assessee and relevant legal precedents in determining the eligibility for exemption. The AO was instructed to provide a reasoned order after affording the assessee a fair opportunity to present its case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2020 13:27:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 689 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391076</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes, directing the AO to re-examine both the primary and alternative claims for exemption under sections 11 and 10(23C) of the Income Tax Act, respectively. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the additional evidences provided by the assessee and relevant legal precedents in determining the eligibility for exemption. The AO was instructed to provide a reasoned order after affording the assessee a fair opportunity to present its case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>