<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 686 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391073</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee. It found the explanation for the income discrepancy plausible, attributing it to adverse developments post-survey. The non-recovery of commission was deemed a deductible business loss related to illegal activities, following precedent cases. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 1,62,00,000 as undisclosed income under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act was deemed unwarranted, leading to its deletion from the total income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2020 13:22:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 686 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391073</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee. It found the explanation for the income discrepancy plausible, attributing it to adverse developments post-survey. The non-recovery of commission was deemed a deductible business loss related to illegal activities, following precedent cases. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 1,62,00,000 as undisclosed income under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act was deemed unwarranted, leading to its deletion from the total income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>