<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 41 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21073</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on allowing initial depreciation on tools and instruments as machinery for the factory&#039;s operation. It also affirmed the full deduction under section 80J for the unit&#039;s partial-year operation. However, the Court directed a fresh decision by the Tribunal on the expenditure for fixing R.C.C. jalies to ascertain if it related to obsolescence or replacement, deviating from the Tribunal&#039;s initial ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:48:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 41 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21073</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision on allowing initial depreciation on tools and instruments as machinery for the factory&#039;s operation. It also affirmed the full deduction under section 80J for the unit&#039;s partial-year operation. However, the Court directed a fresh decision by the Tribunal on the expenditure for fixing R.C.C. jalies to ascertain if it related to obsolescence or replacement, deviating from the Tribunal&#039;s initial ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>