<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 679 - SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391066</link>
    <description>The case involved the misuse of client securities by Karvy Stock Broking Ltd. (KSBL) through unauthorized pledging, leading to SEBI&#039;s interim orders freezing certain securities. Axis Bank Limited&#039;s argument that the pledges were valid was rejected, as pledging fully paid clients&#039; securities without explicit authorization was deemed invalid. SEBI&#039;s directions mandated the release of securities upon proof of authorization for unpaid clients, ensuring compliance with circulars and protecting investor interests. The representation by Axis Bank Limited was resolved in line with the court&#039;s directives, emphasizing adherence to SEBI regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2020 12:50:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 679 - SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391066</link>
      <description>The case involved the misuse of client securities by Karvy Stock Broking Ltd. (KSBL) through unauthorized pledging, leading to SEBI&#039;s interim orders freezing certain securities. Axis Bank Limited&#039;s argument that the pledges were valid was rejected, as pledging fully paid clients&#039; securities without explicit authorization was deemed invalid. SEBI&#039;s directions mandated the release of securities upon proof of authorization for unpaid clients, ensuring compliance with circulars and protecting investor interests. The representation by Axis Bank Limited was resolved in line with the court&#039;s directives, emphasizing adherence to SEBI regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>