<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 673 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391060</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders denying cenvat credit to both appellants, emphasizing the lack of substantial evidence and proper investigation. It highlighted the necessity of thorough examination and corroborating evidence before penalizing companies based on seized documents and statements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2020 12:27:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 673 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391060</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders denying cenvat credit to both appellants, emphasizing the lack of substantial evidence and proper investigation. It highlighted the necessity of thorough examination and corroborating evidence before penalizing companies based on seized documents and statements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>