https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391054 The tribunal set aside the demand for duty and penalty against the appellant, engaged in export activities, due to alleged shortages in their export warehouse. The appellant argued that the losses were within the condonable limit and discrepancies in quantity were measurement errors, not losses. The tribunal agreed, finding no evidence of clandestine removal and deeming the demand unjustified. Consequently, the tribunal allowed the appeal, providing relief to the appellant. en-us Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Jan 2020 12:22:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391054 The tribunal set aside the demand for duty and penalty against the appellant, engaged in export activities, due to alleged shortages in their export warehouse. The appellant argued that the losses were within the condonable limit and discrepancies in quantity were measurement errors, not losses. The tribunal agreed, finding no evidence of clandestine removal and deeming the demand unjustified. Consequently, the tribunal allowed the appeal, providing relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391054