<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (10) TMI 384 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285564</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition for rectification (C.P. No. 62 of 1988) as the petitioners failed to prove their claims and equitable considerations did not support relief. Consequently, the related petition for winding up the company (C.P. No. 48 of 1987) was also dismissed since the petitioners were not recognized as shareholders. No costs were ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2020 10:00:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (10) TMI 384 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285564</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition for rectification (C.P. No. 62 of 1988) as the petitioners failed to prove their claims and equitable considerations did not support relief. Consequently, the related petition for winding up the company (C.P. No. 48 of 1987) was also dismissed since the petitioners were not recognized as shareholders. No costs were ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>