https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391046 The Authority for Advance Ruling admitted the applicant's query on the admissibility of input tax credit and liability for registration. It clarified that separate registration in Karnataka for a works contract was not required, as per the IGST Act. Tax implications for goods purchased from Rajasthan and shipped to Karnataka were explained, emphasizing maintaining the GST chain. The required documentation for transporting goods from Rajasthan to Karnataka was also addressed. The ruling authority concluded that the question on GST registration in Karnataka was beyond its jurisdiction, hence no ruling was provided on this matter. en-us Thu, 03 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Mar 2025 13:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391046 The Authority for Advance Ruling admitted the applicant's query on the admissibility of input tax credit and liability for registration. It clarified that separate registration in Karnataka for a works contract was not required, as per the IGST Act. Tax implications for goods purchased from Rajasthan and shipped to Karnataka were explained, emphasizing maintaining the GST chain. The required documentation for transporting goods from Rajasthan to Karnataka was also addressed. The ruling authority concluded that the question on GST registration in Karnataka was beyond its jurisdiction, hence no ruling was provided on this matter. Case-Laws GST Thu, 03 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391046