https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285557 A lease deed creating a demise in presenti was treated as operative from the date possession was delivered, because the contractual scheme linked the rent and term to delivery of possession rather than execution alone. Section 110 of the Transfer of Property Act was held inapplicable on the facts, and the lessee was entitled to possession on that basis. Later rent-control developments and compromise arrangements between the respondents did not defeat enforcement of the lease, as the doctrine of frustration did not displace rights already created and a compromise between third parties could not bind the appellant. The appellant's right to recover possession was therefore upheld. en-us Fri, 09 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jan 2020 15:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285557 A lease deed creating a demise in presenti was treated as operative from the date possession was delivered, because the contractual scheme linked the rent and term to delivery of possession rather than execution alone. Section 110 of the Transfer of Property Act was held inapplicable on the facts, and the lessee was entitled to possession on that basis. Later rent-control developments and compromise arrangements between the respondents did not defeat enforcement of the lease, as the doctrine of frustration did not displace rights already created and a compromise between third parties could not bind the appellant. The appellant's right to recover possession was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285557