https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285556 Amended pre-emption law was applied to displace the appellants' proprietary claim, leaving them with no surviving right to obtain a decree of pre-emption or to challenge the High Court decree in favour of superior pre-emptors. As inferior pre-emptors, their entitlement could arise only after non-compliance by the superior claimants, and that contingency did not exist. The scheme of the Punjab Pre-emption Act and Order 20, Rule 14 CPC was also treated as barring inconsistent pre-emption decrees for different amounts in the same sale. The appellants therefore could not seek enhancement of the pre-emption money in a rival pre-emptors' appeal. en-us Thu, 28 Aug 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jan 2020 15:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285556 Amended pre-emption law was applied to displace the appellants' proprietary claim, leaving them with no surviving right to obtain a decree of pre-emption or to challenge the High Court decree in favour of superior pre-emptors. As inferior pre-emptors, their entitlement could arise only after non-compliance by the superior claimants, and that contingency did not exist. The scheme of the Punjab Pre-emption Act and Order 20, Rule 14 CPC was also treated as barring inconsistent pre-emption decrees for different amounts in the same sale. The appellants therefore could not seek enhancement of the pre-emption money in a rival pre-emptors' appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Aug 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285556