https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285550 The Board found the petitioner's claims of oppression and mismanagement in the company substantiated, leading to a reduction in her shareholding. Despite the petitioner's failure to refute the respondents' contentions fully, the Board allowed her to exit the company by selling her shares at a fair value of 28.43%. This resolution aimed to provide substantial justice, with the respondents mandated to purchase her shares within four weeks of receiving the valuation report. The petition was disposed of accordingly, with no cost orders issued. en-us Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jan 2020 13:23:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285550 The Board found the petitioner's claims of oppression and mismanagement in the company substantiated, leading to a reduction in her shareholding. Despite the petitioner's failure to refute the respondents' contentions fully, the Board allowed her to exit the company by selling her shares at a fair value of 28.43%. This resolution aimed to provide substantial justice, with the respondents mandated to purchase her shares within four weeks of receiving the valuation report. The petition was disposed of accordingly, with no cost orders issued. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285550