<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 642 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391029</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty imposed under Section 112(a) while upholding the confiscation of goods and the redemption fine. The decision was based on the misdeclaration of imported goods, their classification under a different category than declared, and the corresponding penalties under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 07:57:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 642 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391029</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty imposed under Section 112(a) while upholding the confiscation of goods and the redemption fine. The decision was based on the misdeclaration of imported goods, their classification under a different category than declared, and the corresponding penalties under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391029</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>