<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 15 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21058</link>
    <description>Rules 1C and 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules governing valuation of unquoted shares were treated as mandatory where those rules apply to non-listed shares. The court applied its earlier reasoning on rule 1D and extended the same approach to rule 1C for unquoted preference shares, rejecting a general yield basis valuation. The result was that ordinary, deferred and preference shares were not to be valued on yield basis when the statutory valuation rules governed the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:19:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 15 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21058</link>
      <description>Rules 1C and 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules governing valuation of unquoted shares were treated as mandatory where those rules apply to non-listed shares. The court applied its earlier reasoning on rule 1D and extended the same approach to rule 1C for unquoted preference shares, rejecting a general yield basis valuation. The result was that ordinary, deferred and preference shares were not to be valued on yield basis when the statutory valuation rules governed the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>