<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 635 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391022</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the appeal against the dropping of service tax payment and penalty imposition. The judgment clarified the interpretation of the Place of Provision of Service Rules, ownership of services provided, and the distinction between service provision and subsequent use.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 07:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 635 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391022</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the appeal against the dropping of service tax payment and penalty imposition. The judgment clarified the interpretation of the Place of Provision of Service Rules, ownership of services provided, and the distinction between service provision and subsequent use.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>