https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391021 The court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to the assessment orders for the periods 2012-2013 and 2013-2014, citing discrepancies in import transactions and tax credit reversals. The court held that the valuation discrepancies and taxability issues were beyond its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. While the petitioner could contest the assessment order's accuracy, no factual perversity or legal errors were evident. The court advised the petitioner to seek redress through the statutory appellate process before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, granting two weeks to file an appeal for expedited resolution. Both writ petitions were disposed of, allowing further recourse through the appellate route. en-us Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jan 2020 06:51:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391021 The court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to the assessment orders for the periods 2012-2013 and 2013-2014, citing discrepancies in import transactions and tax credit reversals. The court held that the valuation discrepancies and taxability issues were beyond its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. While the petitioner could contest the assessment order's accuracy, no factual perversity or legal errors were evident. The court advised the petitioner to seek redress through the statutory appellate process before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, granting two weeks to file an appeal for expedited resolution. Both writ petitions were disposed of, allowing further recourse through the appellate route. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391021