<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (4) TMI 1811 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285545</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue challenging the order of the Ld. CIT(A) regarding A.Y. 2009-10 focused on the interpretation of section 153A of the IT Act. The dispute revolved around the scope of assessment or reassessment under section 153A and the treatment of additions made on account of unexplained cash credit under section 68. The appellant successfully demonstrated the legitimacy of the transaction involving unexplained cash credit, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment emphasized the importance of providing proper documentation to substantiate transactions and highlighted the assessing officer&#039;s duty to effectively counter the evidence presented by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:46:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (4) TMI 1811 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285545</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue challenging the order of the Ld. CIT(A) regarding A.Y. 2009-10 focused on the interpretation of section 153A of the IT Act. The dispute revolved around the scope of assessment or reassessment under section 153A and the treatment of additions made on account of unexplained cash credit under section 68. The appellant successfully demonstrated the legitimacy of the transaction involving unexplained cash credit, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment emphasized the importance of providing proper documentation to substantiate transactions and highlighted the assessing officer&#039;s duty to effectively counter the evidence presented by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>