<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 606 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390993</link>
    <description>The appeal for the assessment year 2011-12 was allowed, and the appeal for the assessment year 2012-13 was allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the deletion of transfer pricing adjustments related to royalty shortfall and supply of samples for both years and restored the issue of disallowance under Section 14A for verification. The initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) was dismissed as premature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:58:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 606 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390993</link>
      <description>The appeal for the assessment year 2011-12 was allowed, and the appeal for the assessment year 2012-13 was allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal directed the deletion of transfer pricing adjustments related to royalty shortfall and supply of samples for both years and restored the issue of disallowance under Section 14A for verification. The initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) was dismissed as premature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>