https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285534 The court held that the government was not estopped from withdrawing cash assistance promised to a company for exports under capital goods licenses. It was found that the company exported goods under the obligation of the import license, not solely based on the promise of cash assistance. The unilateral adjustment of cash assistance paid by mistake against future entitlements was deemed illegal and arbitrary, as disputes should be resolved through proper adjudication. The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the government's order and restraining the respondents from implementing the adjustment, while granting liberty for lawful recovery of the cash assistance. en-us Mon, 21 Feb 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:53:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285534 The court held that the government was not estopped from withdrawing cash assistance promised to a company for exports under capital goods licenses. It was found that the company exported goods under the obligation of the import license, not solely based on the promise of cash assistance. The unilateral adjustment of cash assistance paid by mistake against future entitlements was deemed illegal and arbitrary, as disputes should be resolved through proper adjudication. The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the government's order and restraining the respondents from implementing the adjustment, while granting liberty for lawful recovery of the cash assistance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 21 Feb 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285534