https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390986 The High Court held that the Petitioner was entitled to a direction for the Respondent to proceed with the clearance of goods under section 47 of the Customs Act, 1962. Despite the pendency of an appeal, as the Respondent had not filed for a stay, the Court directed the Respondent to take necessary steps for the clearance of the goods within six weeks, unless a judicial order granting a stay was obtained during this period. The writ petition was disposed of with the directive for the release of goods under section 47 of the Customs Act, 1962. en-us Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jan 2020 14:26:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390986 The High Court held that the Petitioner was entitled to a direction for the Respondent to proceed with the clearance of goods under section 47 of the Customs Act, 1962. Despite the pendency of an appeal, as the Respondent had not filed for a stay, the Court directed the Respondent to take necessary steps for the clearance of the goods within six weeks, unless a judicial order granting a stay was obtained during this period. The writ petition was disposed of with the directive for the release of goods under section 47 of the Customs Act, 1962. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390986