<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 592 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390979</link>
    <description>The application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against M/s. Mekko Steel &amp;amp; Power Pvt. Ltd. was dismissed. The Operational Creditor&#039;s claim of outstanding dues since 2011 amounting to Rs. 72,57,236 was found time-barred due to lack of clear acknowledgment and evidence. The absence of a valid balance confirmation and insufficient proof of dues, coupled with the court&#039;s clarification that the Code is not a recovery forum, led to the dismissal. The judgment stressed the necessity of proper evidence and adherence to legal requirements for acknowledgment in insolvency proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 592 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390979</link>
      <description>The application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against M/s. Mekko Steel &amp;amp; Power Pvt. Ltd. was dismissed. The Operational Creditor&#039;s claim of outstanding dues since 2011 amounting to Rs. 72,57,236 was found time-barred due to lack of clear acknowledgment and evidence. The absence of a valid balance confirmation and insufficient proof of dues, coupled with the court&#039;s clarification that the Code is not a recovery forum, led to the dismissal. The judgment stressed the necessity of proper evidence and adherence to legal requirements for acknowledgment in insolvency proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>