https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390976 The Tribunal dismissed Revenue's appeal challenging the recovery of service tax, upholding the dropping of the demand due to lack of discrepancies in document scrutiny. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the Assessee's appeal, ruling that the service provided did not fall under "Supply of Tangible Goods Service" as control and possession remained with another party. The denial of cenvat benefit demand was upheld based on proper documentation. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed Revenue's appeal and allowed the Assessee's appeal, concluding the case. en-us Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jan 2020 14:09:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390976 The Tribunal dismissed Revenue's appeal challenging the recovery of service tax, upholding the dropping of the demand due to lack of discrepancies in document scrutiny. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the Assessee's appeal, ruling that the service provided did not fall under "Supply of Tangible Goods Service" as control and possession remained with another party. The denial of cenvat benefit demand was upheld based on proper documentation. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed Revenue's appeal and allowed the Assessee's appeal, concluding the case. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390976