<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 586 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390973</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order confirming duty demand on the appellant for providing services under &quot;Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Services.&quot; The Tribunal determined that the appellant was actually providing cleaning services through controlled manpower, not manpower recruitment or supply services, based on the contract terms and lack of evidence supporting the duty demand. Previous Tribunal decisions were relied upon to support this conclusion, resulting in the order being overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2020 13:58:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 586 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390973</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order confirming duty demand on the appellant for providing services under &quot;Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Services.&quot; The Tribunal determined that the appellant was actually providing cleaning services through controlled manpower, not manpower recruitment or supply services, based on the contract terms and lack of evidence supporting the duty demand. Previous Tribunal decisions were relied upon to support this conclusion, resulting in the order being overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>