https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21046 Interpretation of section 80HH raised a question of law fit for reference under section 256(2), and the Tribunal could not decline to refer it merely because a similar reference was already pending. The pendency of another reference did not answer the statutory obligation to state the case on the question sought to be referred. The court therefore directed that the reference be made with the statement of case, without examining the merits of the deduction computation issue. en-us Wed, 11 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:23:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21046 Interpretation of section 80HH raised a question of law fit for reference under section 256(2), and the Tribunal could not decline to refer it merely because a similar reference was already pending. The pendency of another reference did not answer the statutory obligation to state the case on the question sought to be referred. The court therefore directed that the reference be made with the statement of case, without examining the merits of the deduction computation issue. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 11 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21046