<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 583 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390970</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal against the denial of Cenvat Credit by the Revenue. The decision was based on precedents and legal provisions, stating that the denial was unjustified as the admissibility of the credit had not been challenged at the Input Service Distributor&#039;s end. Therefore, the appellant was entitled to avail the credit distributed by the ISD for the services in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2020 11:27:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 583 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390970</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal against the denial of Cenvat Credit by the Revenue. The decision was based on precedents and legal provisions, stating that the denial was unjustified as the admissibility of the credit had not been challenged at the Input Service Distributor&#039;s end. Therefore, the appellant was entitled to avail the credit distributed by the ISD for the services in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>