<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (10) TMI 57 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21045</link>
    <description>The court held that the Income-tax Officer is competent to pass a separate order levying interest u/s 215, provided it is within the period prescribed for assessment u/s 153. The order levying interest beyond the prescribed period was deemed invalid. The Revenue succeeded on the legal issue, but the assessee won due to the limitation problem. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, concluding that the order charging interest was invalid in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:21:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (10) TMI 57 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21045</link>
      <description>The court held that the Income-tax Officer is competent to pass a separate order levying interest u/s 215, provided it is within the period prescribed for assessment u/s 153. The order levying interest beyond the prescribed period was deemed invalid. The Revenue succeeded on the legal issue, but the assessee won due to the limitation problem. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, concluding that the order charging interest was invalid in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>