<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1700 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285518</link>
    <description>The Foreign Trade Policy 2004-2009 Served From India Scheme applied to all eligible service providers, and Indian companies were not excluded merely because they were subsidiaries of foreign entities. On that interpretation, the petitioners&#039; entitlement to the restored benefit was accepted, as the earlier rejection had ignored the relevant policy and there was no effective dispute on eligibility. However, refund of customs duty already paid was declined; the proper relief was reissuance of transferable duty free scrips of equivalent value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2020 11:00:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600410" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1700 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285518</link>
      <description>The Foreign Trade Policy 2004-2009 Served From India Scheme applied to all eligible service providers, and Indian companies were not excluded merely because they were subsidiaries of foreign entities. On that interpretation, the petitioners&#039; entitlement to the restored benefit was accepted, as the earlier rejection had ignored the relevant policy and there was no effective dispute on eligibility. However, refund of customs duty already paid was declined; the proper relief was reissuance of transferable duty free scrips of equivalent value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>